Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion

Hope:
Or a change:


(photos via Drudge and HotAir)

I know, he was just watching his step to make sure he didn't slip.

--------------------------------------------
Follow me on Twitter and Facebook

Leon Panetta, Director of the CIA, reportedly gave closed-door testimony to Congress indicating that the CIA withheld certain information from Congress, but there is no indication what that information concerned. This stands in stark contrast to Panetta's prior public statement that Congress was "truthfully" informed regarding interrogation techniques, despite Nancy Pelosi's public statements to the contrary.

Needless to say, the testimony is being used to exonerate Pelosi from her accusation that she was misled as to interrogation techniques. In fact, unless the testimony specifically speaks to the interrogation disclosures, Panetta's testimony actually confirms that Pelosi was not misled as to interrogations.

A letter from several Congressmen asking Panetta to correct Panetta's general statement that it is not CIA practice to mislead Congress, does not address specifically the interrogation techniques issue. The CIA denies that Panetta told Congress that the CIA lied. By leaking a letter addressing only generalized accusations, the Democratic Congressmen get the best of all worlds; they get to underhandedly accuse the CIA of lying to Congress, without having such accusations tested because the substance is classified. They also give their Speaker some ammunition with which to defend herself, and avoid this question:

Why would Panetta confidentially disclose that some programs or information were withheld (assuming that such characterization of the testimony is accurate), but be willing to state publicly that Pelosi was not misled on interrogations?

Until we learn more about the testimony, we cannot say for sure, but as of now, it appears that Panetta is standing by his prior public statement that Congress, including Pelosi, was not misled as to interrogation techniques, even if Congress allegedly was misled as to some other issue.

UPDATE: This Washington Post story appears to confirm that the program allegedly concealed from Congress had nothing to do with interrogation methods. So whatever is in dispute between Congress and the CIA, it does not exonerate Nancy Pelosi from her representation that the CIA concealed information from her regarding interrogation of al-Qaeda detainees.

--------------------------------------------
Related Posts:
Nancy Pelosi Is The Central Issue
Pelosi Surrounds Herself With Herself
Dems Lack Waterboarding Exit Strategy
Pelosi Accuses CIA Of Lying

Follow me on Twitter and Facebook

As I posted previously, Reuters ran a staged photo of a bloodied Honduran protester (upper right). Contrary to the clear implication of the Reuters story, the protester was not bloodied from the protests, but as reported by Hunter Smith at Honduras Abandoned, the protester deliberately wiped blood on his shirt from the ground in order to get photographed.

Now this same protester, identified as Juan Angel Atunez, has appeared in a CNN news report (lower right) by Karl Penhaul in a bloodied shirt claiming that a child died in his arms (h/t to Hunter again). From the official CNN transcript:

HUGO ORELLANA, HONDURAN RED CROSS OFFICIAL (through translator): We have one person dead, a man in his 20s, from a gunshot in the head. And eight people wounded.

PENHAUL: He says. Amid the violent clashes, protestors report more may have died. This man soak soaked in blood says a child died in his arms.

JUAN ANGEL ATUNEZ, PROTESTER (through translator): I ran over beside the boy to try and help him because I didn't want him to die but he died.

It is unclear if a child died at the protests, as most reports state only one adult died. Regardless, Hunter's first hand observation of Atunez wiping blood on himself prior to being photographed and videotaped shows that Atunez staged his appearance and story for dramatic effect, which both Reuters and CNN buying into it.

UPDATE: CNN has responded to this blog post, via Media Bistro (h/t Hunter again!):

CNN had two teams on the ground. We were present throughout the march. CNN staff saw and heard the shooting. The blogger says he was not present at the time the shooting took place. We interviewed a bystander who said he had held a child who was dying. At no point in our interview did the witness allege he saw more than one victim. At the time there was confusion about the age of the victim, who was passed through the crowd, bleeding profusely from his fatal head wound. Many bystanders and journalists initially believed from the size and appearance of the body that the victim was quite young, consistent with the witness's story.

CNN regrets that our report did not point out that we could not independently verify the man's account. Note that CNN carefully reported the official Red Cross death tally of one, but included the assertions from protestors that the death toll may have been higher, as did the blogger.

--------------------------------------------
Related Posts:
Reuters Runs Staged Photo Of Bloody Honduran Protester
Let them come to Tegucigalpa
Hands Off Honduras

Follow me on Twitter and Facebook

Yes, the Democrats do own the federal government now. And everything that happens is theirs alone. The good, the bad, and the ugly. But since the mainstream media is in the tank for Obama, don't expect to hear that view in the major newspapers or on the television networks, other than Fox. (Video h/t HotAir)


--------------------------------------------
Follow me on Twitter and Facebook

One of my enlightened readers from Seattle has a solution to save the planet. He took time out of his busy day to share the secret with me. And since this secret is so important, I will share the advice with you:

Have a nice life, but keep your stupidity to yourself--please. Have you not read the 2000 page cap and trade bill, and the 400 pages of amendments. Let me give you the Gilberts Notes version. We are trying to reduce hot air and toxic waste. Please do your part for the planet and just shut your mouth.

Al Gore must have a groupie, another know-it-all who stays up at night worrying that someone might have a contrary opinion. We cannot stand for disagreement, now, can we.

And like Al Gore, another complete hypocrite, who was a senior executive for a large air freight company. Burned just a few drops of planet-destroying jet fuel in his day. So he takes his guilty conscience out on those of us who don't own a Prius.

The planet must be proud.


(h/t Bloghopenchangery)

--------------------------------------------
Related Posts:
Relax, The Dems Will Screw Up
Liberal Ugliness Revealed On The JournoList
If Obama Builds It, Who Will Maintain It?

Follow me on Twitter and Facebook

Week-by-week, world event-by-world event, the public humiliation of Hillary Clinton is taking place right before our eyes. Actually, not before our eyes. Hillary has gone missing.

There was a time when United States Secretaries of State were front and center in foreign policy making and implementation. Our first Secretary of State was Thomas Jefferson, and other historical luminaries included John Quincy Adams, Daniel Webster, William Jennings Bryant, and George C. Marshall.

In more modern times, names such as Henry Kissinger, Cyrus Vance, James Baker, Madeleine Albright, Colin Powell, and Condolezza Rice loom large in our psyche and history.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton? Who? Possibly the most marginalized Secretary of State in modern times.

Barack Obama has not permitted Hillary to participate in a central manner in any of the major diplomatic events, including the upcoming Moscow summit from which Hillary will be notably absent. Obama doesn't act alone in foreign affairs, but he certainly doesn't act through Hillary.

If the federal government were, say, the City of Chicago, Hillary's status would rate about as high as the Director of the Department of Tourism. Sometimes seen, occasionally heard, but almost never consulted. Sure, Hillary is nice enough, but, being nice enough only gets you so far.

It didn't always appear that it would turn out this way. When Hillary was appointed, with great fanfare, it seemed that she would take a leading role. But the fox was out-foxed.

The treatment of Hillary Clinton by Obama to date amounts to a slow drain of Hillary's political persona. The fearsome tiger now is a pussycat. She missed the Iran crisis because of a broken elbow. Now admittedly, I've never broken my elbow, so maybe I am misinformed. But there doesn't appear to be a reason why Hillary couldn't have talked on the phone with foreign ministers, and done all the other things a Secretary of State does.

If Hillary's loss in the primaries was a body blow, being Secretary of State is like being bled by leeches. Hillary seems to know her political persona is being bled dry, but she feels no physical pain.

And Hillary clearly is not having fun. Has anyone seen Hillary laugh in the last five months? Oh, how I long for that cackle. Hillary can't even bring herself to fake it anymore.

Want a good measure of how bad it is for Hillary? Click on the screen shot (above right) from a Google News search for "Hillary Clinton" taken on July 5, 2009, covering the prior month. Nothing of substance, although I did learn that Chelsea is getting married (Congrats! That should keep Mom busy) and Bill is appearing at a fundraiser.

Sarah Palin gets more hits than Hillary even though the search was for "Hillary Clinton."

I wonder how the Hillary supporters at PUMA and the folks at Hillary's Village feel, watching Hillary wither on Obama's vine.

UPDATE: Similar thoughts from Tina Brown at Daily Beast:

It’s time for Barack Obama to let Hillary Clinton take off her burqa....

It becomes clearer by the day how brilliantly Obama checkmated both Clintons by putting Hillary in the topmost Cabinet job. Secretary Clinton can’t be seen to differ from the president without sabotaging her own power. And ex-President Clinton has been uncharacteristically disciplined about not threatening the careful political equilibrium his wife is trying to maintain....

You could say that Obama is lucky to have such a great foreign-policy wife. Those who voted for Hillary wonder how long she'll be content with an office wifehood of the Saudi variety.

--------------------------------------------
Recent Posts:
It's Still All About Him, Except That It's Not
Senate To Fix Joe Wilson's Imaginary Loophole
The Have Your Cake And Eat It Too Speech

Follow me on Twitter and Facebook

Reuters has run photo of a bloodied Honduran protester (below) dramatizing the bloodshed at protests for Manuel Zelaya. (h/t) Problem is, this photo appears to be staged.

Blogger Hunter Smith, who recently finished his Marine service including two tours in Iraq, flew to Honduras to cover the turmoil. Earlier today, Hunter phoned in this post:

He did see an older man in a white shirt reach down into the blood pool and cover his hands. He then wiped them on his shirt to make it look like his blood or that he had been involved. Hunter saw what he thought was an AP photographer take the man's picture. Hunter said if you see it on the web, don't believe it. It was faked.

If you look at the man in the photo, it is clear that the blood was not the result of a wound, but was wiped on his shirt, just like Hunter said. This photo was staged, although the Reuters photographer did not necessarily know it.

The caption on the photo says: "Supporters of ousted Honduras' President Manuel Zelaya, one of them with a shirt covered with blood, talks to people next to a bullet-riddled motorbike outside the Toncontin international airport in Tegucigalpa July 5, 2009."

Reminds me of Paliwood fauxtography. Sometimes you cannot believe your eyes.

UPDATE: Gateway Pundit found other photos of this same faux-victim, and Hunter has a new post on it.

--------------------------------------------
Related Posts:
Abid Katib - Palestinian Shoe Fauxtographer?
Let them come to Tegucigalpa
Hands Off Honduras

Follow me on Twitter and Facebook

Reliable news is hard to come by, particularly from a foreign country going through turmoil. Which is why new blogger Hunter Smith is doing such a service by blogging (text and photos) from inside the crowds on the streets of Tegucigalpa.

Hunter recently completed his service in the Marines, and decided to hop a flight to Honduras to see first hand what was going on. His blog is Honduras Abandoned.

Right now, Hunter is in the crowd approaching the airport for the possible return of Manuel Zelaya. [Minutes ago it hit the wires that Zelaya's plane was not allowed to land.] Here is his most recent post:

Hunter texted and asked me to update his page. Protesters are being held about a quarter mile from airport. Army feel back, police just fell back and it appears they are letting the protesters to the airport. No violence so far. Protesters are self policing. One protester threw a rock and hit a policeman. Police did not respond and protesters pushed the young man back to the back of the crowd. They have been negotating with the police and appear to have gotten access to the airport after promising no violence.Rumor on the ground is that Mel is on his way and should land in an hour. Just rumors in the crowd. Will update when I hear more from Hunter. He has been with the crowd since morning when they marched on the airport @ 11:30 central time.

Thanks for your service, Hunter, both to the country and to the blogosphere.

UPDATE: This it the type of info. you don't get unless someone is on the ground, from Hunter's latest (emphasis mine):

Protest organizers are trying to send people home. They do not want any more blood shed. Crowd has calmed down but it was very tense when Hunter first arrived. police/army had pulled back from fence. Few people are leaving and he said the crowd is a lot better now. He got pictures of the blood. He did not hear the shots personally.

He did see an older man in a white shirt reach down into the blood pool and cover his hands. He then wiped them on his shirt to make it look like his blood or that he had been involved. Hunter saw what he thought was an AP photographer take the man's picture. Hunter said if you see it on the web, don't believe it. It was faked.

--------------------------------------------
Related Posts:
Let them come to Tegucigalpa
Hands Off Honduras

Follow me on Twitter and Facebook

Sarah Palin is a quitter, according to certain commentators, because she did not serve out her term of office. If that is the case, Palin is in "good" company.

I present to you, Barack Obama, photographed in front of the Capitol, the building where he served for less than two years of his 6-year Senate term before starting the process of running for President, something he promised the voters during his senatorial campaign he would not do:

Sen. Barack Obama acknowledged Sunday [October 22, 2006] he was considering a run for president in 2008, backing off previous statements that he would not do so. The Illinois Democrat said he could no longer stand by the statements he made after his 2004 election and earlier this year that he would serve a full six-year term in Congress.

But that was different, because Obama was advancing his own career, so he was not a quitter, just a climber. Is Palin a quitter or climber? We'll see.

--------------------------------------------
Follow me on Twitter and Facebook

Reports are that ousted President Manuel Zelaya will return to Honduras Sunday, July 5, regardless of what Hondurans want. The Catholic Church in Honduras has asked Zelaya not to return to avoid bloodshed, and the military says that it intends on arresting him on court warrants if he returns. Per The Telegraph:

Amid rising fears of bloodshed, Cardinal Oscar Rodriguez read out a message on onduran television urging Mr Zelaya to stay away to avoid violence. “We think that a return to the country at the moment could provoke a bloodbath,” he said.

Mr Zelaya outlined his plans to the Telesur TV station based in Venezuela, where his close ally Hugo Chavez is president.

“I am planning my return to Honduras... we will arrive at the international airport in Tegucigalpa, Honduras with several presidents, (and) members of international organisations,” he said. “This Sunday we will be in Tegucigalpa.” ....

The Supreme Court has issued an arrest warrant for Mr Zelaya on charges of reason, abuse of office and corruption.

The Guardian adds:

Manuel Zelaya has been warned by the interim government that it will arrest him and put him on trial if he sets foot in the country. He has called on supporters to greet him at the capital's airport, where he said he planned to arrive today in the company of a number of other Latin American leaders, reportedly including the president of Argentina, Cristina Kirchner.

UPDATE: It appears that Kirchner is not joining Zelaya, and it is not even clear if Zelaya will make an attempted return, per Fausta's Blog: Honduras: will Zelaya show up?

--------------------------------------------
Follow me on Twitter and Facebook

I waited a whole day before posting about the Sarah Palin resignation. Well, not a whole day, but longer than almost everyone else in the blogosphere. Here's my take as of this moment in time, subject to change:

I don't know why Sarah Palin resigned, what her plans are, or whether she has or wants a political future.

I do know why the left hates her so much. And it keeps coming back to Trig.

Yes, some people hate Sarah Palin because she doesn't have the traditional pedigree, she isn't one of them, she is too good looking to be taken seriously, etc. And yes, some hate her because they hate her religion, politics, blah blah blah. But that doesn't explain the Sarah Palin hatred. It is so deep as to be pathological.

But it keeps coming back to Trig.

From the moment Palin was nominated for V.P., the attacks on Trig began. First there were the rumors, spread by Andrew Sullivan and others, that Sarah Palin was not Trig's mother, that there was a grand conspiracy of hundreds if not thousands of people to cover up that Bristol Palin was Trig's real mother. Those Trig truther conspiracy theories have been pushed hard by Sullivan and the others continuously to this day.

Then there were the attacks on Palin for bringing Trig on stage at the Republican National Convention, and with her on the campaign trail. HuffPo blogger Suzy Shuster wrote after Palin brought Trig to the V.P. debate in early October 2008:

It actually came after the debate, when for seemingly the millionth time, Sarah Palin trotted out her piece de resistance, her favorite prop of this campaign season: her five and a half month old son Trig. Why is this child up so late every time there is a camera op? ... My point is, if Palin is going to keep shoving the motherhood card down our collective throats, maybe she can start being a mom again and stop using her own kid for political gain. Trig deserves a good night sleep."

And this post from a self-proclaimed feminist:

In addition to keeping Trig up all hours of the night so that she can parade him around a stage after a pitiful debate performance or speech, she's decided to use baby Trig to get some lusty applause out of the audience, because, let's face it, there's nothing evangelical Christians love more than a developmentally disabled baby they can use to their own end.

The accusation that Trig is used as a "prop" has continued to this day. Megan Elaine at Political Inaction, who accuses Palin of "pimping" Trig in the most recent issue of Runner's World:

it's amazing that Palin is, once again, using Trig as a prop. I mean--is it really necessary to have the baby in a picture with her for Runner's World?? Again, we see her willing to pimp out her children, until one of them gets knocked up. Amazing.

And the personal attacks on Trig for having Down Syndrome have gone far beyond anything I have ever seen, even in politics. My post, Wonkette Goes After Trig Palin Again, has some of the details on the people who fancy themselves intellectuals, and use that intellect to spend their days mocking Trig and creating doctored images of him.

Palin's resignation speech brought out more of the Trig mockers. HuffPo blogger Erik Sean Nelson penned his now-famous (and deleted) post arguing that Sarah Palin's political comeback would be pinned to the need for more "retards." Nelson was far from alone. Witness this post at Paliban Daily:

That’s right. Palin is about to embark on a career of causing babies to be born retarded. Down Syndrome, Fetal Alcohol Syndrome, crack addiction, or a good old-fashioned kick to the pregnant tummy, it doesn’t matter to Palin. She wants the world to have more Trigs.

Other than fueling a greater need for social services, think how this could benefit Palin politically. She already tests well with the Retarded demographic, and also the Retarded Sympathizer demographic.

Imagine the world Palin is trying to create, in which instead of a superior race, Palin breeds a stupider race. 20 years from now, she’ll only be in her late 60s. She’ll be able to run for President on the Retard ticket . . . no doubt with full support of Retardeds, Retarded Sympathizers, and the Politically-Correct.

Next time around, when Palin is told “Your platform is completely retarded”, she will be able to say, “You betcha! That’s just what my constituents want!”

At Wordsmoker the intellect in charge posted: "To be honest, it’s hard to decipher what she’s on about, or on, so the most pressing question is this -- did Trig Palin write this speech for her?"

I could go on and on. The internet is full of Trig Palin conspiracy theories, name-calling and Photoshopping. No matter what month, event, or excuse, Palin haters find a reason to attack Trig.

If Sarah Palin had aborted Trig, the left would have been okay with it. If she hid Trig offstage and out of sight, all would be good. But treat the child as you would any other child, and that cannot be tolerated.

There is something about a Down syndrome child in plain view which has exposed the moral and emotional bankruptcy of the left-wing of the Democratic party. And they hate Sarah Palin because deep down, they hate themselves for being who they are.

--------------------------------------------
Related Posts:
"Palin Lied, People Died" And Other Media Fictions
Sarah Palin Too Sexy?
Wonkette Goes After Trig Palin Again
Psst...Don't Tell Andrew Sullivan Our Secret
2012 Campaign Has Started
Why Do They Hate Sarah Palin So Much? She's Happy
Are Anti-Palin Intellectuals Anti-Intelligence?
Where Is The Video Of NY Times Editors Butchering The News?

Follow me on Twitter and Facebook

With each passing day, the vapidness of the Obama administration's foreign policy becomes more clear. Lofty words spoken in the capitals of Europe and the Middle East were just words. From the warm embrace of the bully Hugo Chavez, to the cynical mixed-messages on the Iran protests, Obama has shown a willingness to "work with" repressive regimes hostile to the United States while ignoring friends.

Now it is Honduras, where Obama sides with Manuel Zelaya, a Chavez-prototype who tried to put himself in a perpetual presidency, in violation of Honduran court orders to the contrary. The evidence is overwhelming that had the Honduran military not acted, Honduras would have gone the way of Venezuela.

When is Obama going to learn that you cannot work with the Hugo Chavez's and Mahmood Ahmadinejad's of the world. That doesn't mean military action, but it does mean standing up to them on the world stage, and supporting our friends.

The world loves to pick on small nations standing up to tyrants. Which is why is it not surprising that the international community so quickly has coalesced around isolating Honduras. As with perpetual attacks on Israel at the United Nations and other international organizations, the position of the United States is critical to Honduras. Will we stand with our friend, or join the mob?

John Kennedy's speech in Berlin in 1963 says it all. Then, the battle line was in Berlin and the enemy was communism. This weekend, the city is Tegucigalpa and the tyranny is Chavez-style ego-socialism.

Sure, Honduras is not perfect, but the choice of the people, the courts, and the legislature not to allow Zelaya to gain a stranglehold on power, like Zelaya's friend Chavez, should be respected. Substitute names and places, and the point of Kennedy's speech applies as much today as it did almost a half-century ago:

There are many people in the world who really don't understand, or say they don't, what is the great issue between the free world and the Communist world. Let them come to Berlin. There are some who say that communism is the wave of the future. Let them come to Berlin. And there are some who say in Europe and elsewhere we can work with the Communists. Let them come to Berlin. And there are even a few who say that it is true that communism is an evil system, but it permits us to make economic progress. Lass' sie nach Berlin kommen. Let them come to Berlin.

Obama should fly to Honduras and give a "Let them come to Tegucigalpa" speech. But he won't. Because Obama's no John Kennedy.

-------------------------------------------------
Related Posts:
Hands Off Honduras
Why Didn't The Saudi King Also Bow?
When Will The Europeans Apologize To Us?

Follow me on Twitter and Facebook

The Obama administration's actions towards Honduras continue to defy logic. On the one hand, Obama states that he is for the rule of law. Yet Obama meddles in the worst possible way in Hondurans' attempt to protect their country from a Chavez-style tyranny. Read Fausta's Blog for a full round-up of what Honduras was facing from this deposed dictator-in-the-making.

A Justice of the Honduran Supreme Court has released a statement confirming that the military acted on orders of the judiciary, as reported by Bloomberg:

Honduras’s military acted under judicial orders in deposing President Manuel Zelaya, Supreme Court Justice Rosalinda Cruz said, rejecting the view of President Barack Obama and other leaders that he was toppled in a coup.

“The only thing the armed forces did was carry out an arrest order,” Cruz, 55, said in a telephone interview from the capital, Tegucigalpa. “There’s no doubt he was preparing his own coup by conspiring to shut down the congress and courts.”

Cruz said the court issued a sealed arrest order for Zelaya on June 26, charging him with treason and abuse of power, among other offenses. Zelaya had repeatedly breached the constitution by pushing ahead with a vote about rewriting the nation’s charter that the court ruled illegal, and which opponents contend would have paved the way for a prohibited second term.

She compared Zelaya’s tactics, including his dismissal of the armed forces chief for obeying a court order to impound ballots to be used in the vote, with those of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez.

“Some say it was not Zelaya but Chavez governing,” she said.

While Obama improves relations with Venezuela, Obama has cut military ties to Honduras, is considering a cut-off of all aid, is doing nothing to stop loan suspensions by international organizations over which the U.S. has substantial influence, and is supporting international efforts to isolate Honduras.

Poor and tiny Honduras faces the full wrath of the United States, United Nations, and much of the rest of the world, while nothing is done about Iran. On Iran, Obama and the world acted with the utmost deference, and there were no efforts by the Obama administration at international action. None.

But Honduras, enforcing its own laws against a renegade wannabe President-for-life, for some reason warrants the full force of the United States government and international community. Honduras gets condemnation from Obama, while Chavez gets hugs and Ahmadinejad gets deference. Wonderful. No, horrible.

UPDATE: Must read A 'coup' in Honduras? Nonsense.:

Sometimes, the whole world prefers a lie to the truth. The White House, the United Nations, the Organization of American States, and much of the media have condemned the ouster of Honduran President Manuel Zelaya this past weekend as a
coup d'état.

That is nonsense. In fact, what happened here is nothing short of the triumph of the rule of law....

The Supreme Court and the attorney general ordered Zelaya's arrest for disobeying several court orders compelling him to obey the Constitution. He was detained and taken to Costa Rica. Why? Congress needed time to convene and remove him from office. With him inside the country that would have been impossible. This decision as taken by the 123 (of the 128) members of Congress present that day.

Don't believe the coup myth. The Honduran military acted entirely within the bounds of the Constitution. The military gained nothing but the respect of the nation by its actions.

I am extremely proud of my compatriots. Finally, we have decided to stand up and become a country of laws, not men. From now on, here in Honduras, no one will be above the law.

--------------------------------------------
Related Posts:
"Heads They Win, Tails We Lose" Diplomacy
Obama Throws Venezuelans Under The Bus
He Who Cannot Stop Talking, Is Silent On Iran

Follow me on Twitter and Facebook

I don't think confirmation of a Supreme Court nominee should turn on public polling. Nonetheless, when the public polls favored Sonia Sotomayor, supporters of Sotomayor argued for the relevance of these polls, arguing that "that Obama apparently found the American political center in appointing her."

Then came the Supreme Court's decision in Ricci v. DeStefano, which reversed Sotomayor's ruling on the New Haven firefighters case. Now the public polls have turned down substantially, with a small plurality against Sotomayor's nomination. A Rasmussan poll shows a drop in support with 37% in favor of confirmation, and 39% against.

So, if the polls were relevant when the polls were good for Sotomayor, does that mean the polls still are relevant when the polls are not so good?

--------------------------------------------
Related Posts:
Sotomayor's Supporters May Spin Her Out Of A Job
What Sandra Day O'Connor Said
Sotomayor "Meant What She Said and Said What She Meant"
Prominent Constitutional Scholar Warns Of "Stealth Nominee"
Sotomayor's Damned Statistics

Follow me on Twitter and Facebook

Andrew Sullivan is back on his Trig Palin birther hoax theory, that Sarah Palin is the grandmother and Bristol Palin is the mother. Or what Sullivan calls And The Story The MSM Still Won't Touch.

Sullivan has no evidence, just unanswered questions. That's all it takes for an internet rumor to take hold.

In order for Sullivan's theory to be true, the scope of the conspiracy of silence must be massive, almost on par with the Israeli conspiracy to bomb the World Trade Center and to set up al-Qaeda as the fall guys [note to the humorless watchers, this is a joke].

Sarah Palin officially announced that she was pregnant no later than March 5, 2008 (see USA Today article, above right). Which means that if this is a hoax, at least all of the following people have been in on the conspiracy and have kept their vows of silence for over a year:

• Everyone on Palin's gubernatorial staff, who had daily contact with her
• Everyone in the various departments of the executive and legislative branches who had frequent contact with Palin
• Every Alaskan news source, including the newspapers and television stations which covered the pregnancy and birth
• All of Palin's political opponents, at least through the date she got the V.P. nomination
• Everyone in Wasilla, where everyone seems to know everyone else's business and are amateur psychiatrists (at least according to Vanity Fair)
• Everyone at Wasilla High School, who are keeping quiet that Bristol was pregnant
• Everyone at the Republican Governors' Energy Conference in Houston, where Palin was speaking when her water broke and who must be hiding that Palin didn't look pregnant
• All the physicians, nurses, and other staff at the hospital where Palin gave birth to Trig; and last but not least,
• Levi Johnston, the father of Bristol's son Tripp, who has run at the mouth about so much but has kept the conspiracy quiet. When interviewed by Tyra Banks, Levi said nothing about Bristol being Trig's mom. But then again, he wasn't asked. Oh no, that must mean Tyra's in on the conspiracy! And Larry King didn't ask, either. Larry, how could you?

Hundreds, maybe thousands of people must be keeping this secret, in order for Sullivan's theory to be true. The more people keep silent, the more Sullivan believes. The lack of evidence becomes evidence.

It's like the whole world is throwing a big surprise party, and Andrew Sullivan is the only one who doesn't know where or when. Please, no one tell him our big secret, it's too much fun watching him on his wild Alaskan goose chase.

--------------------------------------------
Related Posts:
"Palin Lied, People Died" And Other Media Fictions
Andrew Sullivan's NeoCon Derangement Syndrome On Steroids
2012 Campaign Has Started
Why Do They Hate Sarah Palin So Much? She's Happy
Wonkette Goes After Trig Palin Again

Elsewhere on the net:
Attacking Palin never gets old
Trig Trutherism! Andrew Sullivan Gets a Lifeline - Again!
Sullivan: MSM Should Die Because They Won't Go Trig Troofer
"Questions that any sane person would ask"
Follow me on Twitter and Facebook