I heard Rush talking about this today. He said guys like Rove are insider numbers guys and ideology means little to them. They are hired to get the independent swing voter to turn the election to their side. They'll get their candidate to say anything to get elected. Just conservative enough to hold the base but just liberal enough to pull in that (so-called) independent voter.
Rush said he doesn't care about what Rove says at this point. Rush thinks we need to send a message and I agree.
He's hurt himself some, but the real damage is that the Tea Party is rebelling against the Republican Establishment. You don't get much more "establishment" than Rove.
So yeah, it's a gaffe, like Marie Antoinette's purported "Let them eat cake". Hut she was in a whole world of trouble before she ever said it (assuming she even did). Rove's in precisely the same position.
I said "none". Once I figured out that "compassionate conservatism" was a code phrase for "big government control", my opinion of Rove hit zero. So, no change in my mind.
It strengths Rove's reputation as an over-the-hill beltway insider to me, but there was a lot of division over the Castle/O'Donnell among the base, so at least 40% of Conversatives somewhat respect what he was saying.
In case you were wondering, all opinions and views expressed on this blog are my own, and do not represent the views of any employer or other organization.
Terms of Use
By using this blog, you agree that all original content on this blog is copyright of William A. Jacobson. You may quote from my posts provided that you clearly identify me as the author, link to the original post or home address of this blog, and do not charge for access to the website, publication or other media in which the quote appears. Although comments are moderated, I accept no responsibility for what other people say, and I reserve the right to block or remove any comment for any reason or no reason. Any e-mails sent to me are subject to publication, and any disputes regarding this site will be litigated exclusively in the jurisidiction in which I reside at the time of the dispute.
I heard Rush talking about this today. He said guys like Rove are insider numbers guys and ideology means little to them. They are hired to get the independent swing voter to turn the election to their side. They'll get their candidate to say anything to get elected. Just conservative enough to hold the base but just liberal enough to pull in that (so-called) independent voter.
ReplyDeleteRush said he doesn't care about what Rove says at this point. Rush thinks we need to send a message and I agree.
He's hurt himself some, but the real damage is that the Tea Party is rebelling against the Republican Establishment. You don't get much more "establishment" than Rove.
ReplyDeleteSo yeah, it's a gaffe, like Marie Antoinette's purported "Let them eat cake". Hut she was in a whole world of trouble before she ever said it (assuming she even did). Rove's in precisely the same position.
I said "none". Once I figured out that "compassionate conservatism" was a code phrase for "big government control", my opinion of Rove hit zero. So, no change in my mind.
ReplyDelete-brian
The question I have not heard asked of Rove is -- 'Was Castle your client?'
ReplyDeleteIt strengths Rove's reputation as an over-the-hill beltway insider to me, but there was a lot of division over the Castle/O'Donnell among the base, so at least 40% of Conversatives somewhat respect what he was saying.
ReplyDelete