SEIU Local 1199, which organizes health care workers, was one of the most outspoken advocates of Obamacare. As reported by The New York Times in August 2009, the former head of Local 1199 took the lead in promoting Obamacare:
For more than a decade, Dennis Rivera was New York’s mightiest labor leader, running a union of 300,000 health care workers that often bent Albany to its will as it scared — and angered — governors, Democratic and Republican, with its hard-hitting ads.
Two summers ago, Mr. Rivera stepped down from that post and largely disappeared. But now, as President Obama’s health care push has run into trouble, Mr. Rivera has emerged as a central player in the effort to save Mr. Obama’s effort.Things are not working out as expected for Local 1199, just like for the rest of the nation. Obamacare is having "unexpected" consequences.
Mr. Rivera is the point man on health reform for the nation’s most politically powerful union, the Service Employees International Union, which is doing more than any other union to push for health legislation. In many ways, the White House is looking to the S.E.I.U. to lead labor in doing the blocking and tackling necessary for Mr. Obama to carry the ball forward.
As reported by The Wall Street Journal, the SEIU Local 1199 health plan will have to drop coverage for children due in substantial part to Obamacare requirements:
One of the largest union-administered health-insurance funds in New York is dropping coverage for the children of more than 30,000 low-wage home attendants, union officials said. The union blamed financial problems it said were caused by the state’s health department and new national health-insurance requirements....Actually, I take no joy in Local 1199's problems. But I also find it hard to feel sorry for them, since it was Local 1199's efforts which caused the problems in the first place, for all of us.
The fund informed its members late last month that their dependents will no longer be covered as of Jan. 1, 2011. Currently about 6,000 children are covered by the benefit fund, some until age 23.
The union fund faced a “dramatic shortfall” between what employers contributed to the fund and the premiums charged by its insurance provider, Fidelis Care, according to Mitra Behroozi, executive director of benefit and pension funds for 1199SEIU. The union fund pools contributions from several home-care agencies and then buys insurance from Fidelis.
“In addition, new federal health-care reform legislation requires plans with dependent coverage to expand that coverage up to age 26,” Behroozi wrote in a letter to members Oct. 22. “Our limited resources are already stretched as far as possible, and meeting this new requirement would be financially impossible.”
--------------------------------------------
Follow me on Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube
Not schadenfreude, Bill. Educational efforts.
ReplyDeleteI think the other word is "Verboten."
If there is one attitude that typifies leftist policy thinking, it is the belief that ideas will have only the consequences you want them to have, not the consequences they are going to have.
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure what le mot juste is, but the phrase
"succumbing to an attack of reality" does suggest itself.
I agree with Dad here. This is something they should have seen coming. OTOH, maybe they DID see it coming and this is just part of the plan to get us all on Socialized Medicine.
ReplyDeleteDeekman, do you really believe that they would sacrifice the well being of children to advance an agenda? Do you?
ReplyDeleteI do. They're icy cold and utterly without compassion. They need to be identified and their plans stopped.
OT: Happy Thanksgiving everyone!
Health Insurance Thirst Mandate
ReplyDeleteHis Benevolence: I have decided to banish thirst from the land.
Advisor: Of course Sire. Tell me more.
His Benevolence: All health insurance will henceforth include unlimited purchases of refreshing drink, like Coke, Pepsi, and 7-Up. The peasants will slake their thirst and be reimbursed by the insurance companies. No co-pay.
Advisor: Your name will be legend. But Sire, will you be paying for this bounty?
His Benevolence: The insurance companies will pay.
Advisor: Yes Sire. To do so, they will have to collect more from the peasants. Probably much more, to satisfy the peasant's unbounded thirst. Will you be lightening your taxes?
His Benevolence: Shall you feel the whip? The taxes remain.
Advisor: Of course Sire. The peasants will have to do their best in their gratitude.
His Benevolence: Whatever. Let it be so. I now grow tired of this subject.
Advisor: I will inform the scribes.
The consequences for the children and their low-income parents are heartbreaking, but I do not mind at all that the Libs who supported ObamaCare "for the sake of children" (without a lick of proof that children would benefit) now must rethink their eagerness to climb aboard the ObamaCare la-la wagon.
ReplyDeleteAhhh...but here is the money-quote:
ReplyDelete“We hope the STATE OF NEW YORK will do the right thing and PROVIDE THE FUNDING necessary for this most vulnerable population of direct caregivers,” the union said in a statement.