******************** THIS BLOG HAS MOVED TO WWW.LEGALINSURRECTION.COM ********************

This blog is moving to www.legalinsurrection.com. If you have not been automatically redirected please click on the link.

NEW COMMENTS will NOT be put through and will NOT be transferred to the new website.

Tuesday, May 3, 2011

Dems Go To The Filibuster Mat For John J. "Jack" McConnell, Jr.

Update - Vote in Senate will be Wednesday at noon.  See updated post, Senate To "Go To War" Today Over Jack McConnell Nomination.

------------------

I have posted frequently about John J. "Jack" McConnell, Jr., nominated for an open seat to the U.S. District Court in Rhode Island.  McConnell is a friend and campaign supporter of Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) who backs McConnell and who repeatedly has threatened retaliation is McConnell did not get an up or down vote, and was filibustered.

McConnell is very, very controversial because he donated several hundred thousand dollars to Democrats, made inflammatory anti-Republican statements, engaged in dubious lead paint litigation which was thrown out of court, and has refused to release records regarding a questionable settlement in one of his lead paint cases.

McConnell is the first District Court nominee ever opposed by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.  Ever.  That should tell you something.

This is McConnell's second go-round.  He was one of four nominees left out of a deal last Christmas in which numerous Obama nominees were confirmed.

McConnell passed the Senate Judiciary Committee on a party-line vote, with the exception of Lindsey Graham, who voted in favor.

Perhaps emboldened with Obama's new-found momentum, Harry Reid just filed a cloture petition on McConnell's confirmation, meaning that there will be a cloture vote as early as tomorrow.

If cloture is achieved, McConnell almost certainly will be confirmed because of the Democratic majority in the Senate.

It is important that you make clear to Republicans in the Senate that they should not vote for cloture.

Start by contacting Lindsey Graham's office, via e-mail or better yet, telephone 202-224-5972.

(Added) Powerline has more on McConnell.

Update:  My sources tell me that in addition to Graham the following Republicans may vote in favor of cloture, leaving only 41 against:  Cornyn, Thune, Hatch , Snowe and Collins.  (Added.) Apparently Kirk and Brown also are potential problems, so there may not be enough to stop the nomination, but things are fluid.  I have calls or e-mails into several offices, and I'll keep you informed.

Contact info. for Senators who are on the fence or whose positions are not known:

John Thune – 202-224-2321 / e-mail
Scott Brown – 202-224-4543 / e-mail
Richard Lugar - 202-224-4814 / e-mail
Orrin Hatch - 202-224-5251 / e-mail
Mark Kirk - 202-224-2854 / e-mail
Marco Rubio - 202-224-3041 / e-mail
Saxby Chamliss – 202-224-3521 / e-mail
Johnny Isakson - 202-224-3643 / e-mail
Richard Burr - 202-224-3154 / e-mail
Olympia Snowe - 202-224-5344 / e-mail
Susan Collins - 202-224-2523 / e-mail

Updates as they come in:

Cornyn, not completely confirmed, but appears he will vote against cloture and will give strong speech on Senate floor that McConnell is an "extraordinary circumstance." (Added) Cornyn circulated a devastating letter to his colleagues urging them to oppose cloture, arguing that McConnell deliberately misled the Judiciary Committee (via Point of Law)

Lugar's press secretary e-mails as follows:  "Sen. Lugar will oppose the nomination of McConnell. Lugar will vote against cloture."

Graham and Collins now are on record as saying the will vote for cloture.

--------------------------------------------
Follow me on Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube
Visit the Legal Insurrection Shop on CafePress!
Bookmark and Share

8 comments:

  1. "...has refused to release records regarding a questionable settlement in one of his lead paint cases."

    Good luck with THAT line of attack. Now that us "crazies", "chumps", and "retards" who took issue with Obama's outrageous refusal to release ALL of his important record have been thoroughly vilified by "polite society" who have "more important" issues to focus on, what argument can anyone make to compel anyone to release lesser records? It is no longer common sense to assume that people who hide things have something to hide.

    Justice isn't blind, it's arbitrary.

    ReplyDelete
  2. No one can ever accuse you of not being thorough.

    It only took a couple minutes to cut and paste off an email to Scott. Thanks and I hope this works out in favor of all law abiding citizens of RI.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I phoned them all for you, professor. However. you have Kirk twice and nothing for Brown on your list...might be worth a correct. Skype is super eary to use...less than 15 minutes for seven or eight completed calls....I noticed some of the sens lines were busy and they went to the message machine....

    ReplyDelete
  4. Can I just ask if Olympia and Susan share a brain? Because they can't seem to do anything separate from the other.

    /snark off

    ReplyDelete
  5. Posted an Action Alert at Disrupt the Narrative and am making calls now.

    Thanks for the heads up! This was definitely not on my radar screen.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Contacted my senator (Kirk). We'll see.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Ruffages, I was thinking I'd seen the names from that whole list in association with each other too many times.

    Of course, I'm from New England, so I'd tend to notice

    ReplyDelete