I was going to write a post about Dana Milbank's attention-seeking column in The Washington Post about how he supposedly is going to stop writing about or even talking about Sarah Palin for the month of February.
The Milbank column really is a window into the mind of mainstream media journalists and pundits. To them, Palin is like the ticking of an out-of-reach wall clock in the middle of the night; they can't get her out of their heads but they can't seem to stop her no matter how many times they throw things at her.
If this were just another case of Palin Derangement Syndrome, it probably would not be worth a post
But as documented at Big Journalism (h/t Instapundit) WaPo is using its pages to promote Milbank's other brilliant idea, a mainstream media boycott of Palin going beyond Milbank's column. WaPo has used its Twitter account and has run online polls in support of Milbank's boycott.
Rarely do we get such a clear example of the bias of the mainstream media and the extent to which it fears and hates Sarah Palin.
But since she is "not electable" because of this media bias, we should throw Palin overboard and demand she not run and not be taken seriously by Republican voters, right?
Because Dana Milbank and the Editors of The Washington Post get to pick our candidates, right?
Follow me on Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube
Visit the Legal Insurrection Shop on CafePress!