I'll be posting updates about the court proceedings in Wisconsin throughout the day, based on various news reports, in reverse chronological order (with commentary from time to time by me):
Further updates will take place in new post.
Per tweet, Sumi says dismayed since an "easy" solution - revote and renotice.
As I suspected, the day was not done. Per tweet, Sumi enjoined further implementation of bill.
Not clear as day ended in court whether there would be modifications to the TRO to stop implementatino of the law. Per in-court tweets, session has ended, but some directive to attorneys to work on the form of Order.
Local TV station reports there will be no decision today, and hearings resume Friday.
Per tweet, looks like done with witnesses, at least for the day, and Sumi now going to hear arguments on alterning the TRO. Not sure if this means she's expanding the scope.
Showing video in court of committee meeting. So?
Per tweet, looks like case will continue today, after State requested recess because legislators immune, but then will continue Friday. Does this mean two days off from hearings? Not clear.
Bob Lang, Director of Legislative Fiscal Bureau testifying about process by which bill was rewritten to take out fiscal matters and pass committee -- per tweet no single place in Capitol in which committees held.
After lunch break, per tweets, discussion of who can represent Sec. of State. Apparently new lawyer showed up and Judge expressed surprise that meeting client for first time. Well what did she expect, it was only a couple of hours ago that she told the State to get him a lawyer. Another example of how today's hearing has turned into a sideshow over whether the bill is law.
"Stephen Miller, who runs the bureau, said he called Deputy Attorney General Kevin St. John on Friday before publishing the law, after Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald (R-Juneau) suggested doing so.
Miller said he had independently concluded he had a duty to publish the law, and [Deputy Attorney General Kevin] St. John agreed with that....
Miller said he concluded he was required to publish the law, but he did not believe that it would go into effect until the secretary of state acted. Fitzgerald and the Department of Justice disagree, saying the law is now in effect because the bureau published the law."ACLU Wisconsin also live tweeting - while much will be made of the fact that LRB was asked to publish the bill, I don't think that makes any legal difference. The issue is whether publication was effective, not why they did it. Per tweet, head of LRB says that comfortable that publishing was correct:
Jessica Arp, a local TV reporter, is live tweeting the hearings. She notes at approx. 11:20 a.m. (CT):
Wisconsin State Journal - Appeals court denies request of Attorney General to withdraw appeal on ground law has come into effect already.
For those keeping score at home, we haven't even touched the open meetings issue yet today. Only publication procedure from last week.JSOnline - Testimony by a witness from the Legislative Reference Bureau (LRB) to the effect that the LRB was directed by Scott Fitzgerald, the Republican Senate leader, to publish the budget repair bill.
JSOnline - Judge Sumi ordered the State to get a separate attorney for the Secretary of State, since the Dept. of Justice position on the law (that it was in effect) differed from the position of the Sec. of State.
JSOnline - hearings today before Judge Sumi to continue on the issue of whether the budget repair bill has become law.
Follow me on Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube
Visit the Legal Insurrection Shop on CafePress!