******************** THIS BLOG HAS MOVED TO WWW.LEGALINSURRECTION.COM ********************

This blog is moving to www.legalinsurrection.com. If you have not been automatically redirected please click on the link.

NEW COMMENTS will NOT be put through and will NOT be transferred to the new website.

Friday, December 5, 2008

An Argument Against Boycotts By A Gay Marriage Advocate

I have argued that the "Mormon boycott" resulting from the passage of California Proposition 8 is both unjustifiable and harmful to the cause of gay marriage. (See my article at American Thinker and post immediately below). In an article titled Boycotts That Backfire, Jennifer Vanasco does not address the anti-Mormon nature of the boycotts, but makes some good points:

We have many tools at our disposal as we react to the taking away of our marriage rights in California. National protests. Lawsuits. A new ballot amendment. Lobbying legislators. Wearing the White Knot. But there's one popular tool that's more of a blunt instrument than a lever: boycotts on businesses because their CEO or other employees gave personal money to Yes on 8.

There are good boycotts and bad ones. This is the bad kind....

Why is it a bad boycott? First, because it makes no sense. It's as if we are punishing an entire family because one member let loose a racial slur. And unfair, overzealous actions like this tend to lead to backlashes. Second, because it is likely to fail. Boycotts are tough to sustain (look at the way Baptists tried to boycott Disney); and when they wind up having no significant impact, it makes the group boycotting seem less powerful. Third — and most importantly — this sort of boycott is bad even if it succeeds. It's bad because companies are very reactive to losing business, especially in hard economic times. And corporations do a lot to protect themselves. I fear that the result of these sorts boycotts — if they are successful — will be for companies to add a "no personal political or campaign donations" clause to their employment contracts....

Boycotting is a blunt instrument. Let's not smash through our own interests accidentally.

1 comment:

  1. Thank you for your comments. It is apparent we can't pick on any one group or type of people and think it is ok to harm a group and their families. This is what Hitler did with the Jews and you are correct. It came back to be a very bad thing. Neither was treating the Slaves as a lesser group of people. If we want fairness, we must accept our differences even when we disagree on the reason. I think hurting others for your cause is never right.

    ReplyDelete