Sarah Palin's choice for attorney general once wrote a column defending the statue of a KKK figure as an expression of free speech and mocked the psychology of a college student who protested the display.At Washington Monthly, the sarcasm is palpable: "I guess the governor's vetting team is about as good as John McCain's?"
These bloggers are not stupid. They are just playing the game. Defending the rights of abhorrent groups to express their opinions is as old as .... the ACLU. I wonder what Russ Feingold thought of the ACLU defending the Klan's right to march in Madison, WI, on Martin Luther King, Jr.'s birthday:
January 4, 1999 -- The Ku Klux Klan will be allowed to have its rally at the Capitol on Jan. 16 -- Martin Luther King's birthday.And what Al Franken thought of the ACLU coming to the Klan's aid in Minnesota:
The state had originally refused the Klan's petition to gather at the Capitol, saying it would incite violence and cause harm to public safety.
But the American Civil Liberties Union stepped up in defense of the Klan and represented the white supremacy group in Monday's hearing before U.S. District Judge Barbara Crabb.
In response to growing concerns over permit applications filed on behalf of the Ku Klux Klan and local KKK opposition group Can The Klan, the Minnesota Civil Liberties Union today is demanding that the Department of Administration grant the applications of both groups to rally on the capital by Friday.We could go on and on with these examples. Under the reasoning of these bloggers, anyone affiliated with the ACLU should be barred from public service because the ACLU defends the Klan's freedom of speech.
So these bloggers should be calling upon Obama to withdraw the nomination of "ACLU-trained" nominee to head the Office of Legal Counsel, Dawn Johnsen. Just like some groups on the right are demanding.
I don't think that will happen. After all, it's just a game. And that's too bad, regardless of who's doing it.
Follow me on Twitter and Facebook