tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1522121129844880066.post8028702838860475447..comments2023-10-24T11:23:31.580-04:00Comments on Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion: The French ConnectionWilliam A. Jacobsonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16433685588536441422noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1522121129844880066.post-52964752639617380802011-03-29T19:09:46.491-04:002011-03-29T19:09:46.491-04:00There were no clear, apparent reasons for Sarkozy ...There were no clear, apparent reasons for Sarkozy pushing to interfer in what was in the early stages of a civil war. Quite the contrary, there was NO mass slaughter (although Obama said we have avoided a genocide, much like his jobs "saved" mentality). <br /><br />If Sarkozy is using this to pump up his popularity, he is really betting on a long shot. The French have long ceased showing the back bone for war. And Gdaffy is going no where without ground troops. Is Sarkozy willing to put French troops in Libya only to send them back to Paris in body bags?<br /><br />There are no good guys in the Libyan strife. It seems Sarkozy are betting that the side he has chosen is the least radical. He may well be wrong.retire05https://www.blogger.com/profile/04192090871824415437noreply@blogger.com