tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1522121129844880066.post7771633729856945428..comments2023-10-24T11:23:31.580-04:00Comments on Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion: No Expedited Path To U.S. Sup. Ct. for Virginia Health Care CaseWilliam A. Jacobsonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16433685588536441422noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1522121129844880066.post-63525065323275477492011-04-25T12:48:04.198-04:002011-04-25T12:48:04.198-04:00Looks like Justice Kagan did not recuse herself.Looks like Justice Kagan did not recuse herself.KitKathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07920750666849384448noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1522121129844880066.post-44525328771274388922011-04-25T11:01:48.063-04:002011-04-25T11:01:48.063-04:00Why is it that "... politically a relatively ...Why is it that "... politically a relatively prompt resolution is important?"<br /><br />From my perspective, the longer this thing hangs out there, the better. Keeping this issue alive keeps it in the forefront. Getting a decision now relegates it to dusty old relic, likely forgotten y a great deal of the electorate this next election.K.J. Hintonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04071279261669117974noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1522121129844880066.post-41368126005087520132011-04-25T10:55:10.066-04:002011-04-25T10:55:10.066-04:00@Neo - I previously posted on this issue with rega...@Neo - I previously posted on this issue with regard to the Arizona immigration <a href="http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2010/08/why-not-file-us-v-arizona-in-us-sup-ct.html" rel="nofollow">lawsuit</a>William A. Jacobsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16433685588536441422noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1522121129844880066.post-37487381959204426942011-04-25T10:47:37.240-04:002011-04-25T10:47:37.240-04:00"In all cases affecting ambassadors, other pu..."In all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a state shall be party, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction. In all the other cases before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact, with such exceptions, and under such regulations as the Congress shall make." -- Article III, Section 2<br /><br />Don't they have "original jurisdiction" ?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com